Legal Opinion

In Re Giles

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1994No. SB-93-0013-D. Disciplinary Commission Nos. 86-1508, 88-0307PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is a State Bar disciplinary proceeding. The Hearing Committee recommended that respondent be suspended for 30 days. The Disciplinary Commission recommended that respondent be suspended for 90 days and make restitution to two complainants. Respondent timely appealed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. 46(a).

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This disciplinary proceeding concerns the conduct of respondent, Charles Giles, an attorney since 1964, in two separate matters. Each matter is discussed separately.

I. Client A

In 1978…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, FioramontiArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Matter of GaynesArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Woods v. QC Financial Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. In Re VarbelArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re VarbelArizona Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API