Legal Opinion

Soergel v. Preston

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1985No. Docket 77105PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal as of right from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and a permanent injunction.

The issue in this case involves an easement. Plaintiffs and defendants are owners of adjacent parcels of property in Van Burén County. Plaintiffs’ servient parcel will be referred to as parcel A; defendants’ dominant parcel, which lies directly west of parcel A, shall be referred to as parcel B; the parcel of property west of parcel B will be referred to as parcel C. Defendants own both parcel B and parcel C, but apparently bought them from different owners.

On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClintic-Marshall Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Delaney v. PondMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Longton v. StedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Roy v. Chevrolet Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Crew's Die Casting Corp. v. DavidowMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schadewald v. BruleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Janet Travis, Inc. v. Preka Holdings, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Wilkins v. GagliardiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Dobie v. MorrisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API