Legal Opinion

Dobie v. Morrison

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1998No. Docket 200661PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court held that plaintiffs are the riparian owners of the real property in question, known as “the park” located in Ottland Shores subdivision in Woodland Township, subject to defendants’ easement. Plaintiffs appealed the judgment to this Court, while some defendants have cross appealed. The defendants who are participating in the cross appeal 1 essentially contend that the trial court erred in determining that plaintiffs were the owners in fee of the park. Both parties challenge the scope of the easement that the trial court found defendants have in the park. We affirm.

This action…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thies v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Integral Insurance v. Maersk Container Service Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Michigan National Bank & Trust Co. v. MorrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Croucher v. WoosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Hess v. West Bloomfield TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Beulah Hoagland Appleton Qualified Personal Residence Trust v. Emmet County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Dyball v. LennoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Higgins Lake Property Owners Ass'n v. Gerrish TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Little v. KinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API