Legal Opinion

Former Employees of IBM Corp. v. United States Secretary of Labor

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 1, 2005No. Slip Op. 05-92; Court 03-00656PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARZILAY, Judge.

This case concerns a number of software developers (also referred to as “software programmers”), including the 126 petitioning workers who became separated from their employment when their jobs were outsourced by IBM to Canada and India. These same workers, originally AT & T employees, had previously been transferred from the AT & T payroll to IBM with representations that “IBM is a leader in the outsourcing industry, and we believe our people will have good career opportunities there.” Jeff May, Shipped Out— The Story of How AT & T Moved 3,500 Workers to a New “Career”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Former Employees of Hawkins Oil & Gas, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
  4. Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Former Employees of Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  2. Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  3. Former Employees of Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  4. Former Employees of International Business MacHines Corp. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  5. Former Employees of International Business MacHines Corp. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API