Legal Opinion

Former Employees of International Business MacHines Corp. v. U.S. Secretary of Labor

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 2, 2005No. 1:98-s-00295PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge:

In some cases for as many as 30 or 40 years up to the time of their termination in 2003, Plaintiffs in this action (the “Former Employees”) labored in the oil and gas industry, supporting exploration, drilling, and production from the same wells owned by the same oil company, doing the same tasks, day in and day out, seated at the same desks, inside the same facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

The Former Employees’ initial employer, Amoco Corporation, merged with The British Petroleum Company p.l.c. in 1998, and — as a result — the Former Employees became employees of BP Amoco…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. SKF USA Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  4. Gerald Metals, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  2. Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  3. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. Former Employees of International Business MacHines Corp. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  5. Former Employees of Invista, S.A.R.L. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API