Legal Opinion
Star-Glo Associates, Lp v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 13, 2005No. 2004-5074PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Star-Glo Associates, LP (“Star-Glo”) and Ruby Red Equities, LP (“Ruby Red”) appeal from a judgment of the Court of Federal Claims, rejecting their claim for additional federal benefit payments for destroyed citrus groves. Star-Glo Assocs., LP v. United States, 59 Fed.Cl. 724 (2004). The Court of Federal Claims held that funding to compensate owners of destroyed groves, authorized by Public Law No. 106-387, § 810(e) (2000), was subject to a $58,000,000 statutory cap, and that, because the cap had been reached and the available funds exhausted before the suit was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Prairie County, Montana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Ramah Navajo Chapter v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Samish Indian Nation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.