Legal Opinion

Prati v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 16, 2008No. 02-60TPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

BLOCK, Judge.

This action is representative of 77 factually-similar, so-called “AMCOR” partnership tax refund cases, which are consolidated for the purposes of the instant motions. These partnerships comprised part of a group of similarly-structured California limited partnerships that were marketed and managed by American Agri-Corp., Inc. (“AMCOR”). Beginning in 2001, 129 AMCOR tax refund cases were filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, of which 124 were transferred to this judge for administrative convenience and efficiency reasons by request of the parties.1 Of the 124…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Duffie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Keener v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Buser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API