Samish Indian Nation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
The issues on appeal before this court are ones of statutory construction. We must decide whether certain claims are premised on money-mandating statutes and are therefore within the jurisdiction of the United States Court of Federal Claims pursuant to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a), and the Indian Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1505. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed for lack of jurisdiction over the claims brought by the Samish Indian Nation (“Samish”) because some of their allegations were not premised upon any statute that was money-mandating, and the allegations…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- United States v. White Mountain Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lincoln v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Navajo NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gravatt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- May v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Mercier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.