Legal Opinion
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Salazar
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 9, 2011No. 08-2262PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
We are faced with an apparent contradiction. Pursuant to the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (“ISDA”), the United States enters into self-determination contracts with Indian tribes and tribal organizations “for the planning, conduct and administration of programs or services which are otherwise provided to Indian tribes and their members pursuant to Federal law.” 25 U.S.C. § 450b(j). These agreements include contract support costs (“CSCs”) which are the “reasonable costs for activities that must be carried on by a tribal organization as a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Lincoln v. VigilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. LeavittSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Salazar v. Ramah Navajo ChapterSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- El Paso Natural Gas Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Valdez v. McGillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.