Metro MacHine Corp. v. Mizenko
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whiting
In this case, we decide whether an injured worker was the borrowed servant of the defendant and, if so, whether that fact precludes his federal maritime law negligence claim against the defendant.
Michael Mizenko, a skilled laborer, was employed by Abacus Temporary Services (Abacus), a company that had contracted to supply Metro Machine Corporation (Metro) with skilled labor on request. Pursuant to its contract, Abacus sent Mizenko to work for Metro in the performance of Metro’s contract for the “multi-faceted overhaul and repair” of the USS COMPTE DE GRASSE, a naval vessel afloat in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Paul v. Ruiz v. Shell Oil Company, National Tank CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Gaudet v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Weidman v. BabcockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Slater v. Skyhawk Transportation, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Ondrusek v. MurphyAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Frank v. Hawaii Planing Mill FoundationHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Sherry Clark Home Improvement v. Gary HerndonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.