Legal Opinion
Ondrusek v. Murphy
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 2005No. S-11196PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arises from an injury that occurred at Chilkoot Horseback Adventures on a day that it was closed for business. Travis Locke, an employee of Chilkoot, took his mother and stepfather, the Ondruseks, out for a horseback ride. Upon return, Locke's mother got off her horse without assistance, but she fell and suffered a broken leg. The Ondruseks sued Robert Murphy d/b/a Chil-koot Horseback Adventures for negligence under a theory of respondeat superior. The superior court denied the Ondruseks' motion for summary judgment on this issue and the case…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lama Romero v. AsociacionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Lackner v. LaCroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Kiesau v. BantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Anthony P. Locricchio, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Legal Services Corp., Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- John W. Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Terex Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Mrl Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hughes v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Garcia v. WindleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Cameron v. CHANG-CRAFTAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Larson v. BenediktssonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.