Legal Opinion

Weidman v. Babcock

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 11, 1991No. Record 900616PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Compton

This is an appeal in two civil actions, consolidated below for trial, brought by two clients against their former attorney at law. The plaintiffs seek damages for the attorney’s alleged “breach of fiduciary responsibility” to the clients. First, we will address an issue of appellate procedure. Second, we will consider the merits of the trial court’s substantive ruling.

In 1988, appellant William J. Weidman and his brother, appellant Richard C. Weidman, M.D., filed separate and virtually identical actions against appellee William L. Babcock, Jr., Esquire, and his law firm, appellee Ross, Marsh,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox v. DeeseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Reid v. BaumgardnerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  3. May v. MartinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
  4. Langley v. MeredithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  5. Hilton v. FayenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Ohree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  2. Nusbaum v. BerlinSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  3. Chawla v. BurgerBusters, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. Scialdone v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  5. West v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API