Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan
The primary issue in this appeal is whether a worker who was injured while performing ship repair is barred by the exclusivity provision of the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, Code § 65.1-1 et seq. (now Code § 65.2-100 et seq.) (Virginia Act), from asserting a negligence action under the general maritime law against a prime contractor, as well as a subcontractor who was not his employer. We conclude that, under the facts presented in this case, the Virginia exclusivity provision cannot be applied to bar Mizenko’s federal maritime action against Electric Motor and Contracting Company…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Sisson v. RubySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Metro MacHine Corp. v. MizenkoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. LittleSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- Moore v. CAPITOL FINISHES, INC.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Morrow v. MarineMax, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.