Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1964No. Crim. 9435PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered against her following a nonjury trial wherein she was convicted of the crime of pandering in violation of section 266i of the Penal Code.

The information upon which the prosecution was based charged defendant in substantially the same language found in subdivision (c) thereof, i.e., that defendant did procure an identified female person “a place as an inmate of a house of prostitution.” This subdivision also proscribes the procuring for a female person a place “as an inmate of any place in which prostitution is encouraged or allowed within this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. CourtneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. MeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. NasworthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. MarronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. AlvaradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. OsunaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. People v. McEwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API