Legal Opinion
People v. Marron
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 1934No. Crim. No. 2539PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
Defendants were convicted on each of three counts of the crime of pandering, and on one count of the crime of conspiracy to commit the same offense. They appeal from the ensuing judgments that were rendered against them, as well as from an order by which their motion for a new trial was denied.
By the terms of the statute (Stats. 1911, p. 9) under which in part the defendants were prosecuted, it is provided that:
*434“Any person who shall procure a female inmate for a house of prostitution, . . . shall be guilty of a felony, to-wit: pandering, ...”
In that connection, the first point presented in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pon v. WittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. MeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
- People v. SlaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Ferguson v. Superior Court of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Cartwright v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. CourtneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.