Legal Opinion
People v. Schultz
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1965No. Crim. 5113PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
On this appeal from the judgment of conviction for violating Penal Code section 266 1 (pandering), defendant, Lori Schultz (also known as Shirley Schultz), raises a number of issues. The facts pertinent to each of these issues will be discussed in our consideration of the separate issues.
The Jurisdiction of the Court at the Time of Judgment to Correct the Error Which it Made in Previously Stating That it Found Defendant Guilty of Violating Section 266h Instead of Section 266i
By grand jury indictment defendant and Gilbert Schultz were charged with three felonies: Count one of the indictment…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Willson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. PrewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. TorresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. BenenatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In Re CandelarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. HartsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. MeniusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.