Legal Opinion

Brown v. Roughton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 20, 1923No. 3084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This was a suit for injunction and other relief embracing a prayer to have a deed canceled or declared void on the ground that, while it was absolute in form, it was in fact intended as a deed to secure the payment of a debt infected with usury, the grantor remaining in possession of the property conveyed. The petition seeks also to have declared void a contract to pay a certain amount as rent, on the ground that, while the contract purports to be an obligation for the payment of rent, its real consideration is interest on the debt at a usurious rate. The injunctive relief is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pope v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Tribble v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Liles v. Bank of Camden CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Bashinski v. SwintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Brown v. BondsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Biggers v. Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Poulk v. Cairo Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Bennett v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. McGraw v. Planters BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API