Brown v. Roughton
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
This was a suit for injunction and other relief embracing a prayer to have a deed canceled or declared void on the ground that, while it was absolute in form, it was in fact intended as a deed to secure the payment of a debt infected with usury, the grantor remaining in possession of the property conveyed. The petition seeks also to have declared void a contract to pay a certain amount as rent, on the ground that, while the contract purports to be an obligation for the payment of rent, its real consideration is interest on the debt at a usurious rate. The injunctive relief is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pope v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Tribble v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Liles v. Bank of Camden CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Bashinski v. SwintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Brown v. BondsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Biggers v. Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Poulk v. Cairo Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Bennett v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- McGraw v. Planters BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934