Poulk v. Cairo Banking Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The Civil Code (1910), § 3438, provided that “Any person, company, or corporation violating the provisions of section 3436 shall forfeit the excess of interest so charged or taken, or contracted to be reserved, charged or taken.” And § 3442 provided that “All titles to property made as a part of an usurious contract, or to evade the laws against usury, are void.” The act of 1916 (Acts 1916, p. 48) repealed the sections above quoted; and in lieu thereof the legislature enacted:
*342(1) “Any person, company, or corporation, violating tbe provisions of section…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Liles v. Bank of Camden CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Camp Lumber Co. v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Brown v. RoughtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Tennille Banking Co. v. QuinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wardlaw v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Nash Loan Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Jones v. Central Builders Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- IDS HOMES CORPORATION v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Hartsfield Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.