Legal Opinion

Liles v. Bank of Camden County

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1921No. 2154PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Highsmith. Camden superior court. June 19, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

A deed executed by a borrower prior to the act approved August 18, 1916 (Acts 1916, p. 48), relating to penalties for charging usury, under the Civil Code, § 3306 et seq., to secure a debt infected with usury, and purporting not only to convey title to the lender, but also to confer on the lender a power of sale, is void, and therefore ineffectual either to pass title or to create a valid power of sale. Civil Code, § 3442; Pottle v. Lowe. 99 Ga. 576 (27 S. E. 145, 59 Am. St. R. 246); Wacasie v. Radford, 142 Ga. 113 (82 S. E. 442). But under the maxim, “ He who would have equity must do equity…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garbutt v. MayoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Campbell & Jones v. MurraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  3. Echols v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Pottle v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Patterson v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Redwine v. FrizzellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Wardlaw v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Biggers v. Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Georgia Baptist Orphans Home Inc. v. MoonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API