Legal Opinion

McGraw v. Planters Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1934No. 9621PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. “A deed executed by a borrower, since the act approved August 18, 1916 (Acts 1916, p. 48), relating to penalties for charging usury, to secure a debt infected with usury, and purporting to convey the title to the lender, is not void because so infected with usury. The only penalty to be incurred under the above act is to forfeit the entire interest charged or taken, or contracted to be reserved, charged, or taken. . . Before a borrower, who has executed a deed infected with usury, can have affirmative equitable relief, such as injunction to prevent exercise of the power of sale by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poulk v. Cairo Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. King Brothers & Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Brown v. RoughtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nash Loan Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. IDS HOMES CORPORATION v. LucasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API