Aronson v. Capital One Financial Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
COHILL, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the court for disposition are defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 2); Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs’ Affidavits (Doc. No. 8); and Motion to Compel Payment of Costs Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(d) (Doc. No. 16). In addition, plaintiffs Shi-lesh Chaturvedi and Mark B. Aronson have each filed a Motion for Leave to Supplement His Affidavit and to File Further Affidavits in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 11 & 12).
I. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs’ Affidavits
We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Burt N. Sempier v. Johnson & HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Greenwood Trust Company v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Venter v. PotterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010