Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gonsalves

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 9, 2000PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

We are concerned in this case with an assertion by the office of the district attorney for the Plymouth district (district attorney), that an order entered under Mass. R. Crim. P. 15 (d), as appearing in 422 Mass. 1501 (1996), directing that office to pay the attorney’s fees and costs of the defendant’s private counsel, is unconstitutional. We reject the argument.

*614The following summarizes the background of the case. The defendant was charged in the Superior Court with trafficking in cocaine. A judge in that court allowed the defendant’s motion to suppress the cocaine, and his statements to a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  5. Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TorresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. SinforosoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. AugustineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. StampleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. HaskellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API