Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Sinforoso
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 15, 2001PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.
The defendant was convicted of trafficking in cocaine in an amount exceeding 200 grams in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32E. The Appeals Court reversed the conviction in an unpublished memorandum and order pursuant to its rule 1:28, concluding there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction. 49 Mass. App. Ct. 1103 (2000). We granted the Commonwealth’s application for further appellate review. We find there was sufficient evidence to convict the defendant of trafficking in cocaine, and also rule that the judge correctly denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. YesilcimanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ScottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. FeyenordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. SwaffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.