Keyhea v. Rushen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we hold that state prisoners presently have a statutory right to refuse long-term treatment with psychotropic drugs absent a judicial determination that they are incompetent to do so.
I. Introduction
Psychotropic (or antipsychotic) drugs 1 have become a primary tool of public mental health professionals for treating serious mental disorders, replacing such earlier measures as lobotomy, insulin shock, and electroshock. In many patients they minimize or eliminate psychotic symptoms. (Kemna, Current Status of Institutionalized Mental Health Patients’ Right to Refuse…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Guardianship of RoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- In Re QawiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Conservatorship of WendlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Madrid v. GomezDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- People v. DunkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Kennard Davis v. James WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.