Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Downey (In Re Downey)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho
Decided October 28, 1999No. 19-40186PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
TERRY L. MYERS, Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiffs Louis and Marilyn Palmer (“Palmers”) seek to deny the discharge of debtors Michael and Barbara Downey (“Downeys” or “Debtors”) pursuant to § 727(a)(4) of the Code. Trial having been held, and the Court having evaluated the evidence submitted at trial and the arguments of the parties, this decision constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Fed.R.Bankr.Proc. 7052.
BACKGROUND
The Palmers timely filed a complaint objecting to entry of discharge. The sole cause…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,524 in Re Cloyd W. Devers and Barbara Devers, Debtors. Cloyd W. Devers and Barbara Devers v. Bank of Sheridan, MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In the Matter of Daniel J. Yonikus and Carolyn S. Yonikus, Debtors. Appeal of Daniel J. YonikusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Carlucci & Legum v. Murray (In Re Murray)District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- In Re RollandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2004
- United States Trustee v. Halishak (In Re Halishak)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Leimbach v. Lane (In Re Lane)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2003
- Saslow v. Michael (In Re Michael)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.