Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Loretizo

California Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1963No. Crim. 7234PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as “defendant”) seeks a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he is being illegally restrained of his liberty by the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles.

Facts: Defendant was convicted of violating section 43.12.1 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, which provides, in part: “It shall be unlawful for any person ... to have in his . . . possession in the City of Los Angeles any writing, memoranda, betting marker, or betting sheet, upon which is recorded any bet or bets or wager or wagers . . . upon the result ... of any . . . contest of skill, speed or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Tolman v. UnderhillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Agnew v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. In Re MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Galvan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Hom v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Lamb v. MirinNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Carl v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API