Legal Opinion

Carl v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1976No. Civ. 46223PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUS, P. J.

Until a few years ago, sidewalk newsracks were nothing but a convenience for the vendee, as well as an economical means of distribution for the vendor. Lately, however, because their proliferation has made them a major traffic hazard for pedestrians and their contents indicate that they are a handy way of peddling smut, they have aroused the concern of local legislatures and become the subject of prohibitory and regulatory ordinances. It is understandable that their transformation from a convenience to a municipal problem does not always trigger legislative responses which…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho MirageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. AMERICAN BOOKSELLERS ASSN. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Gluck v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API