Carl v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Until a few years ago, sidewalk newsracks were nothing but a convenience for the vendee, as well as an economical means of distribution for the vendor. Lately, however, because their proliferation has made them a major traffic hazard for pedestrians and their contents indicate that they are a handy way of peddling smut, they have aroused the concern of local legislatures and become the subject of prohibitory and regulatory ordinances. It is understandable that their transformation from a convenience to a municipal problem does not always trigger legislative responses which…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho MirageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- AMERICAN BOOKSELLERS ASSN. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Gluck v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.