Legal Opinion
McDonough v. Kahle
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Iris McDonough and Fred Zoss, personal representatives of Dale McDonough’s Estate, challenged Roger Kahle’s ownership of certain bank accounts, certificates of deposit, and farmland. The trial court granted Kahle’s motion for a directed verdict. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Roger Kahle and Clarence Dale Mc-Donough were friends. McDonough asked Kahle to handle his affairs after his death. McDonough died intestate on June 18, 1995. He was survived by his estranged wife, Iris, and three sons, all of whom lived in Oregon at the time of his death.
[¶ 3.] After…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Loyd S. DACE, Appellant, v. ACF INDUSTRIES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Bauman v. AuchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Reuben C. Setliff, III, M.D., P.C. v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Wyman v. BrucknerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Alvine v. Mercedes-Benz of North AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Brevet International, Inc. v. Great Plains Luggage Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Garland v. RossknechtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.