Legal Opinion

Sabag v. Continental South Dakota

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1985No. 14526PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

This is an appeal from a jury award of $65,000 in a malicious prosecution action. The trial court entered judgment upon the jury verdict and denied appellants’ motions for a new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

Kurt Sabag, plaintiff-appellee (Sabag), was employed as a salesman by Confinen-*351tal South Dakota, defendant-appellant. Continental South Dakota, a subsidiary of eodefendant-appellant CPS Continental, is a wholesale distributor of food products. Continental South Dakota and CFS…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. People v. TarsiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. Steven John AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. LeoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Bauman v. AuchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API