Sabag v. Continental South Dakota
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Justice.
ACTION
This is an appeal from a jury award of $65,000 in a malicious prosecution action. The trial court entered judgment upon the jury verdict and denied appellants’ motions for a new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
Kurt Sabag, plaintiff-appellee (Sabag), was employed as a salesman by Confinen-*351tal South Dakota, defendant-appellant. Continental South Dakota, a subsidiary of eodefendant-appellant CPS Continental, is a wholesale distributor of food products. Continental South Dakota and CFS…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- People v. TarsiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. Steven John AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Drier v. Perfection, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. LeoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Bauman v. AuchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Nelson v. Nelson Cattle Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.