Legal Opinion
Alvine v. Mercedes-Benz of North America
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 2001No. NonePublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Circuit Judge
[¶ 1.] Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (Mercedes-Benz) appeals from a judgment determining that it breached an express warranty for a used Mercedes automobile purchased by Frank Alvine. We affirm all issues but remand issue 4 in part.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] In 1992, Mercedes-Benz introduced a new model automobile, the 500 *610SEL. Everything on this model was new except the engine. Mercedes-Benz offered a limited written warranty with this vehicle, which provided in part:
Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (MBNA) warrants to the original and each subsequent owner of a new Mercedes-Benz passenger car…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. John Deere Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Stormo v. StrongSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Schuler v. City of MobridgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. GallipoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Crisman v. Determan Chiropractic, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Bunkers v. JacobsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Reuben C. Setliff, III, M.D., P.C. v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- JAS Enterprises, Inc. v. BBS Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.