Legal Opinion
Speyer, Inc. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 12, 1968No. Nos. 17057, 17058PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge:
A gasoline fire destroyed plaintiff Speyer's garage and sixty-five taxicabs owned by plaintiff Yellow Cab Company of Erie, a tenant of Speyer. A diversity suit to recover the fire damage was instituted in the District Court against Humble Oil and Refining Company, a gasoline supplier, and A. O. Smith Corporation, successor-in-interest to the manufacturer of a certain gasoline pump. A twelve-day non-jury trial followed, and the court, after receiving 2,000 pages of transcribed testimony, rendered judgment in favor of both defendants.1 Both plaintiffs…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Kuisis v. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Rochez Brothers, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Charles R. RhoadesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Shultz v. Wheaton Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Francioni v. Gibsonia Truck Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.