Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Sorenson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1955No. 8153PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

This is an action to quiet title to realty, known as the Black Jack mining claims in the Erickson Mining District in Jaub County, Utah. Plaintiffs herein are the children and successors in interest of James T. Morgan and Frank A. Cromar, who located the claims in question about 1930. The plaintiffs contend that they have a valid and subsisting interest in the claims and that defendants’ attempt to relocate the same properties beclouds their title. Defendants, on the other hand, assert that they validly relocated the claims in 19S1 after plaintiffs had abandoned them by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Chamberlain Etl Al. v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Emerson v. McWhirterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. De Lamar's Nevada Gold Mining Co. v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Schlegel v. HoughOregon Supreme Court · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. One (1) Porsche 2-Door, I.D. No. 911211026, Title No. PP10026F Bearing Kansas License Plate No. JOR 1652Utah Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Knight v. Flat Top Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Morgan v. SorensonUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. State v. One (1) Porsche 2-Door, I.D. No. 911211026, Title No. PP10026F Bearing Kansas License Plate No. JOR 1652Utah Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API