Legal Opinion

Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. Lum

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1975No. 2241, 2250Published

1Opinion of the Court

538 P.2d 994 (1975)

MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH et al., Appellants,

v.

W. Burton LUM and Helen Lum, Appellees.

W. Burton LUM and Helen Lum, Cross-Appellants,

v.

MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH et al., Cross-Appellees.

Nos. 2241, 2250.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

August 8, 1975.

W.C. Arnold, Anchorage, John D. Shaw, Palmer, for appellants and cross-appellees.

John R. Strachan, Anchorage, for appellees and cross-appellants.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and CONNOR, ERWIN, BOOCHEVER and FITZGERALD, JJ.

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This case brings up for review several questions about the procedures employed, and the rights of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API