Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. Lum

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1975No. 2241, 2250PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C. J., and CONNOR, ERWIN, BOOCHEVER and FITZGERALD, JJ. CONNOR, Justice.

This case brings up for review several questions about the procedures employed, and the rights of tenured teachers, in non-retention proceedings. W. Burton Lum and Helen Lum were both tenured teachers with the Matanuska-Susitna School District. In March of 1972, they both received notices of nonretention advising them that they would not be retained as teachers for the 1972-73 school year. The notices stated causes and detailed particulars. The Lums were both charged with incompetency and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Keiner v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Paul G. Simard v. Board of Education of the Town of GrotonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. TwoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  3. South Anchorage Concerned Coalition, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage Board of AdjustmentAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Linstad v. Sitka School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Fedpac International, Inc. v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API