Plass v. Plass
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Hapa County. E. D. Ham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
This action is brought to obtain a decree that Charles W. Plass, deceased, held an undivided one-third of the premises described in the complaint, in trust for plaintiff, and that plaintiff is the owner of an undivided one-third of said property. Plaintiff had judgment, from which the defendants, Phillip Plass, as executor and individually, and Charles Plass, Jr., appeal upon bill of exceptions. Briefly stated, the court found that a resulting trust arose in favor of plaintiff in the property first described in the complaint, known as the “Haskell ranch,” by reason of plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Johnson v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Bell v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Baker v. ViningSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dabney-Johnston Oil Corp. v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Socol v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Harris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- McWhorter v. McWhorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Black v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.