Harris v. Harris
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County and from orders denying a motion to vacate the judgment and to enter a contrary judgment and denying a new trial. G. W. Nieol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff was married to one W. N. Harris at Stockton, in this state, in Oetobér, 1873, and thereafter lived with him as his wife until March 26, 1892. At that date an agreement, called a separation agreement, was entered into between them, under which they lived apart for about two years, and then resumed their former relation, and continued to live together until the death of Harris, in October, 1898. Harris had been married in Georgia, in July, 1848, and when he came to California, in 1850, he left his wife in Georgia, where she continued to live until her death, in 1892, and also a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hurlburt v. . HurlburtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Bauer v. GarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Murphy v. WaterhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Plass v. PlassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Piercy v. PiercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Croce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Taylor v. BunnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.