State v. Hurst
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The defendant argues that the trial court erred in admitting the statement of Roneka Jackson. First, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting the hearsay testimony of Roneka Jackson “pursuant to N.C.G.S. §8C-1, Rule 804(b)5,” which was in the form of an out-of-court recorded oral statement given to a police investigator. The defendant argues that the statement lacks the inherent trustworthiness necessary for admission under Rule 804(b)(5), and therefore admission of the statement violated defendant’s constitutional right to confront a witness, based on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. TriplettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. TylerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. ClontsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.