Legal Opinion

State v. Nichols

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 9, 1988No. 385A86PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

This appeal raises questions involving (1) the admissibility of an unavailable witness’s statement under North Carolina Evidence Rule 804(b)(5) 1 ; (2) whether the prosecutor intentionally failed to provide defendant with requested impeachment evidence; (3) whether the trial court should have ordered an inquiry into the fitness of a juror during the sentencing phase of this proceeding; (4) whether the state made a prima facie showing of a conspiracy independent of a co-conspirator’s declarations; and (5) the sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. RoperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. State v. MahaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. WynneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API