State v. Clonts
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*98Defendant and Whisman were having drinks at Whisman's hotel when Defendant texted Allen and asked Allen to join them. Whisman had never met Allen, but she had heard a lot about him from Defendant, and testified: "In fact, I [honestly] believed they were brothers." Allen left work at approximately 6:30 p.m. and joined Defendant and Whisman at the hotel. All three possessed valid concealed carry permits and were armed. Allen visited with Defendant and Whisman before he left to return home in his Jeep. Shortly thereafter, Defendant drove Whisman in her Jeep back to the house, and stopped on the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- State v. ClontsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. Quiterio-MorrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025