Wilson v. Taylor

In this case, we are called on to decide whether a defendant against whom a land contract forfeiture judgment has been obtained must pay an amount, representing the monthly payments under the contract, in excess of the judgment to preclude entry of a writ of restitution.1 For the reasons detailed *235below, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and conclude that the writ of restitution in this case was issued improperly.

i

Defendants in this case are husband and wife. They entered into a land contract for a two-unit residential property with Lynette Marie Luft in August 1989. In January…