Legal Opinion

Arrand v. Graham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1941No. Docket No. 38, Calendar No. 41,366PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Walter E. Madill and wife held title as tenants by the entirety to a theatre building in Chesaning, Michigan. On October 28, 1935, Mr. Madill entered into a written lease of the building and certain equipment therein with Fred A. Graham for a term of five years and with an option for an extension of five years and also for purchase of the equipment. Upon the death of Mr. Graham on August 27, 1937, Vera Graham, his widow and defendant herein, continued to manage the theatre and for over two years Madill accepted the rent from her without objection. On September 28, 1939, Albert R. Arrand and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Pray v. StebbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Way v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Dolby v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Morrill v. MorrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Wilson v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Dow v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Morgan v. Cincinnati InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Budwit v. HerrMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API