People v. Chappelone
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
At first blush, this appeal presents what appears to be a relatively straightforward issue: did the trial court properly calculate the amount of restitution owed by husband and wife defendants Yvonne and Michael Chappelone for the theft of a large quantity of retail merchandise from Yvonne’s employer, Target? Upon closer examination, however, this appeal presents numerous complexities, such as how to value merchandise that was already damaged prior to the theft; whether the merchandise should be valued at its retail or wholesale price; and whether the calculation should be…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- People v. Vo Nghia SyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- People v. PanganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. WeathertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Walker v. Appellate Div. of the Superior Court of L. A. Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.