Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

P. v. Petronella CA4/3

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 2013No. G044628MUnpublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.

A jury found defendant Michael Vincent Petronella guilty of 33 counts of violating Insurance Code section 11880, subdivision (a). That statute makes it a crime for anyone to knowingly make a “false or fraudulent statement ... of any fact material to the determination of the premium, rate, or cost of any policy of workers’ compensation insurance issued or administered by the State Compensation Insurance Fund for the purpose of reducing the premium, rate, or cost of the insurance.” The jury also found defendant’s crimes constituted a pattern of related fraudulent…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. MinceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. GivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. RiddlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. ArcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. Artykov CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. People v. Audette CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API