Legal Opinion

People v. Millsap

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1927No. Docket No. 1463PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, J., pro tem.

— Defendant was tried and convicted upon an indictment charging perjury and appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. By demurrer to the indictment and also by motion in arrest of judgment he raised the point that the indictment does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense. The act charged as perjury was the verification of an answer in a civil action. The indictment set up in full the complaint in that action and the answer thereto. The complaint was filed in the superior court of Los Angeles County on June 22, 1922,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Gilfether v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Beecher v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. In Re WiegandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1939
  4. People v. ApplegateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. People v. GodinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API