Legal Opinion

People v. Godines

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1936No. Crim. 2891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J., pro tem.

Appellant, convicted of perjury, appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial and from the order denying her motion in arrest of judgment. The appeal from the latter order must be dismissed; it is not an appealable order. (Pen. Code, sec. 1237; People v. Rico, (1936) 14 Cal. App. (2d) 666 [58 Pac. (2d) 956].) Because a communication from the appellant to her husband was admitted in evidence over her objection, however, the appeal from the order denying a new trial has merit. We are of the opinion, furthermore, that both the substance of the sworn statement,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. People v. MullingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McDonald v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. MabryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. In Re KelloggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. People v. DorseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. People v. CortezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API