People v. Howard
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Defendant -was convicted of perjury in the superior court of the comity of Los Angeles, and *657appeals from the judgment and an order denying him a new trial.
Upon his arraignment defendant moved to set aside the information, upon the ground that he had not been legally committed by a magistrate. The motion was denied, and its denial is the basis of one of the excep„ tions upon which defendant relies for a reversal of the judgment.
The complaint lodged with the magistrate, upon which the prosecution is founded, attempted to charge defendant with having, on October 25, 1894, at the citjr of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. VelardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People v. StaplesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- United States v. CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- People v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- People v. ElliotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. HinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. Lee LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Republic of Hawaii v. NenchiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1899
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.