Legal Opinion
Ball-Incon Glass v. Adams
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 24, 1995No. 83729, 83739PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
Petitioners, Ball-Incon Glass and The Travelers Insurance (collectively Ball), and Counter-Petitioners, Kerr Glass and CNA Insurance (collectively Kerr), seek review of a Workers’ Compensation court order finding Sandra Adams (Claimant) had sustained compensable injuries and apportioning liability for permanent partial disability compensation, but making Ball solely hable for other benefits.
Claimant worked for Kerr from 1980 until February 28, 1992. On that date Kerr sold its plant to Ball. Claimant worked for Bah until the plant closed in December…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. BradleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Kerr Glass Co. v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Parks v. Kerr GlassCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- Keco, Inc. v. HaywardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. SpiegelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Energy Exchanger Co. v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. SpiegelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Energy Exchanger Co. v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.