Legal Opinion
Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. Spiegel
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 4, 2005No. 101,195PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge.
T1 Petitioners Anderson Mechanical, Inc. (Employer) and Bituminous Casualty (Insurer, or collectively, Petitioners) seek review of an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers' Compensation Court affirming the trial court's order(s) dismissing Respondent Massachusetts Bay Insurance Co. (MBI), and denying Employer's motion to add a previous insurer as a party-respondent. Having reviewed the record, however, we discern no error. Accordingly, the order of the three-judge panel is sustained.
T2 Respondent David Spiegel (Claimant) worked for Employer for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Reeves v. AgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Brock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- State ex rel. Macy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Womack v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Cole v. Silverado Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CNA Insurance Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Energy Exchanger Co. v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Southern Material Handling Co. v. FallingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Anderson Mechanical, Inc. v. SpiegelCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Energy Exchanger Co. v. HillCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.