Legal Opinion
Howard Fields & Associates v. Grand Wailea Co.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided February 18, 1993No. 92-00704PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING ARBITRATION
KAY, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
On February 16, 1988, Howard Fields & Associates (Plaintiff) and Grand Hyatt Wai-lea (Defendant) entered into a “Consulting Services Agreement” (Agreement). Under the Agreement, and a July 31, 1989 amendment to the Agreement, Plaintiff was to provide design, consulting, and construction administration services to Defendant. The Agreement contained a dispute resolution clause that provided, in part:
Owner and Consultant recognize that it is in their mutual best interests to resolve and settle any claims…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cecala v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Valrose Maui, Inc. v. MacLyn Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- M & L Power Services, Inc. v. American Networks InternationalDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
- Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- HL Libby Corp. v. Skelly and Loy, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.