Legal Opinion

Ostroth v. Warren Regency, GP, LLC

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2006No. Docket 126859PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This architectural malpractice case poses the issue whether MCL 600.5839 is only a statute of repose, in which case MCL 600.5805(6) or (10) supplies a shorter limitations period, or is itself both a statute of repose and a statute of limitations. The Court of Appeals concluded that § 5839 is both a statute of repose *39and a statute of limitations and thus the plaintiffs cause of action is not time-barred.1 We agree and accordingly affirm that decision and remand the matter to the circuit court.

FACTS

In April 1998, defendant Edward Schulak, Hobbs & Black, Inc., architects and consultants, was the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. O'BRIEN v. Hazelet & ErdalMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Gladych v. New Family Homes, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Haynes v NeshewatMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Feyz v. Mercy Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Cowles v. Bank WestMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API