Ostroth v. Warren Regency, GP, LLC
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
This architectural malpractice case poses the issue whether MCL 600.5839 is only a statute of repose, in which case MCL 600.5805(6) or (10) supplies a shorter limitations period, or is itself both a statute of repose and a statute of limitations. The Court of Appeals concluded that § 5839 is both a statute of repose *39and a statute of limitations and thus the plaintiffs cause of action is not time-barred.1 We agree and accordingly affirm that decision and remand the matter to the circuit court.
FACTS
In April 1998, defendant Edward Schulak, Hobbs & Black, Inc., architects and consultants, was the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
- DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- O'BRIEN v. Hazelet & ErdalMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Gladych v. New Family Homes, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Robinson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Haynes v NeshewatMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Feyz v. Mercy Memorial HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Cowles v. Bank WestMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.